Faith Well Grounded

Don't get the misunderstanding that this book is some dry, dusty theology manual in disguise. It is quite the literary accomplishemnt, and stands on its own as a work of brilliant fiction. As a matter of fact, it ranks right up there with his Narnia collection, though it is much different in genre, style and subject matter.

But then again, it is much more than a work of fiction. It is a brilliant satire of human nature. It is also a brilliant insight into the unseen forces that shape our societies and personal beliefs. As a Christian philosopher, I thoroughly enjoyed the principles of the natural and supernatural-- sometimes blatant, sometimes subtle-- that were knitted throughout the letters.

Lewis was a brilliant philosopher, though some neglect to give him this due. His keen insight into human nature and the core of Christianity just sweat their way out of the pages. He emphasizes the important things in the religion (things underemphasized by most), and satires the unimportant (which too many overemphasize). Of most notable, Lewis uses this work as a way to remind us that Christianity is about getting outside of ourselves. It is about loving God and heeding totally that relationship. It is also about loving others. Only when we turn out attention outward do we live up to our calling into His Kingsom.

I gave it a 9-- not necessarily because I could find anything wrong with it, but maybe merely because I can't bring myself to call anything perfect. If I must quote a failure of the book, I guess I'll just mark it for being 224 pages. I could have spied on the "enemy camp" for weeks on end.

I guess a reread is in order...

Now, if you raised your eyebrows at my foray into the supernatural, if you filter everything through naturalistic presuppositions, read the book anyway. Take it as a satire of the human condition and enjoy it. Or, read with an open mind. Then pick up a copy of "Miracles" by the same author. I can think of no one better than Lewis to point out the confines and self-refuting nature of your presuppositions. :)