Faith Well Grounded

Just in the effort to bring this to a bit of a close...

Ir sounds to me as though you claim ID speaks on the subject of purpose with no evidence, thus must refrain, yet these scientific textbooks speak on the subject of purpose with evidence?

It sounds as though this is your argument. (Note, stop confusing the matter with absolute claims about God's existence. We're talking about purpose.)

Now, ID says, "Hey, there's no way this happened by chance."

You say, Give me the evidence."

Evolution says, "It was unguided. It had no purpose."

Now, I'd sure love to see the evidence you must be relying on to support that claim. Because it's the same subject they're both speaking on, and you're defending one's right to speak on it while claiming the other has no basis. You sure have gone a long way from the claim that they just don't speak on the subjects where they have no evidence to speak on.

PS: We covered the negative evidence argument.

I'll leave the last word here for you. This subject is becoming exhausted, and I unfortunately truly am constrained by other matters.

Thanks.