You're still digging to get lies, I think....

In other words, Behe lied when he said ID is scientific and not religious.

per

As no evidence in the record indicates that any other scientific proposition’s validity rests on belief in God, nor is the Court aware of any such scientific propositions, Professor Behe’s assertion constitutes substantial evidence that in his view, as is commensurate with other prominent ID leaders, ID is a religious and not a scientific proposition.

This, I think was your strongest point to try and paint him as a liar, and it still fails. If scientific evidence points to God, then science would rest on a belief in God. Debarring God from science is a very recent requirement in science, actually.

IOW, when Behe says ID is "science" he's not using the same definition as the rest of us.

Exactly.

IOW, when Behe says irreducible complexity shows that evolution can't happen, he's talking out his arse.

In "Darwin's Black Box", Behe very specifically defines irreducible complexity. In his many revisits to the definition in response to his critics, he is very specific in such definition. Other than knowing what he wrote, I have no idea what the judge is referring to.

IOW, when Behe was shown to be wrong, he purposely changed his definition to avoid such an inconvenience.

Being unfamiliar with the redefinition, I can't comment. Being familiar with the word "likely", I don't think I need to.

IOW, Behe has closed his mind to the possibility of evolution.

And is being crucified by those who have closed their mind to the possibility of design...

IOW, Behe lied, or else his definition of "quantitative aspect" is similar to "science".

Having been painted into corners myself by talented debaters, I feel for him.

IOW, Behe lied when he said this peer-reviewed article supports ID.

This last one is just funny. Further in the judge's ruling, he said that there is no "dualism" between design and evolution, and now he creates one. Behe claimed it supports design and under certain circumstances it may support evolution. I still don't see the lie.

You seem pretty set and ready to accuse and convict. Now, you have someone drill you on your beliefs and record everything you say and see how well you fare. You may get painted into corners. You may require the occasional pause to scratch your head. And you may have an entire community trying to paint you as a liar.

Take care...

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Syndicate

Syndicate content